If you’ve ever tried to get a VP or C-suite calendar cleared for a “leadership workshop,” you already know this truth: executives are not looking for training. They want solutions to the problems they’re losing sleep over.
Those challenges might include decision-making processes that fail to produce desired results, new organizational structures that have not yet reached their potential, misalignment across functions that slows progress or transformation efforts that have stalled. As learning professionals, we know that executive leadership development programming can address those struggles. However, it will only get traction when it stops looking like a training and starts looking like strategy.
From my experience partnering with senior leaders (and as one myself), here are my recommendations for building learning experiences that get positive attention and have meaningful impact at the top.
Why Do Executives Push Back on Training?
I understand why senior leaders may hesitate to join a “training.” At that point in their career, they’ve (hopefully) been through hundreds of hours of coaching and development, so it may feel like they’ve already arrived with the skills and capacities they need to perform.
Part of the resistance isn’t a disinterest in growth; it’s to a word. “Training” and “development” get used interchangeably in most L&D vocabularies, and they aren’t the same thing.
A “training” invites compliance-era associations: sit, absorb and move on. An initiative framed around a business challenge, like leading through a merger, aligning a newly formed C-suite or activating a strategic pivot, creates a completely different level of engagement because it’s solving their problem rather than delivering someone else’s curriculum.
Why Is Leadership Development Important for Executives?
77% of organizations are struggling with leadership gaps at all levels, and only one in five executive teams are actually high-performing.
A leadership team that’s misaligned on priorities doesn’t just slow down one department. It delays every department, and executive leadership development is an essential tool for ensuring a business strategy gets executed.
Bain & Company recommends prioritizing five behaviors for performance – direction (or, alignment), discipline (meaning, effective decision-making), collaboration (or, solving problems together), dynamism (as in, leading change) and drive (read: industriousness). McKinsey’s research identified a similar group of practices, with team alignment and effective collaboration among the top drivers of better financial performance.
The good news is that L&D can develop these capacities in others. The opportunity is to translate competencies into operational behaviors that support the organization’s goals and culture.
What Does Effective Executive Leadership Development Require?
Pulling from research on leadership development effectiveness and our own work designing programs for senior executives, a few elements consistently separate the programs that stick from the ones that don’t include:
- They must be tied to a real strategic goal or business challenge.
- They lead to application and accountability.
- They’re led by someone who understands the executive role.
- They give leaders a shared language for how they think, decide and communicate.
- They’re experiential, not lecture-driven.
1. They must be tied to a real strategic goal or business challenge
To risk sounding like a broken record, the strongest executive leadership development training is designed around something the organization is truly trying to solve for: operationalizing their own competency model, a leadership transition, a rapid-growth phase, a restructuring, a culture shift or a strategic planning cycle.
Development is most effective when it’s anchored to a performance outcome the business already cares about rather than interesting content that lacks a clear tie to what leadership is being asked to accomplish right now.
These moments are also when executive appetite for the work is strongest. Accelerating a key initiative, supporting a specific transition or mitigating cross-functional friction creates urgency and receptivity to learning.
2. They lead to application and accountability
Executives have sat through enough workshops to be skeptical of their long-term impact, especially if there is not a clear opportunity for application.
Adults don’t typically resist changing because they lack motivation. They often have real, competing commitments pulling against the shift they say they want to make, and behavior change requires repeated practice and reinforcement to become habitual.
Effective executive development programs are designed with this in mind: they build in structured follow-up, clear commitments and a way to measure whether daily actions have shifted.
3. They’re led by someone who understands the executive role
Peer-level credibility matters enormously in this room, and it’s a significant reason why executive coaching has grown as its own discipline.
Senior leaders are often more isolated than any other level in the organization with fewer peers who can challenge their thinking without having an agenda. They need someone who can put themselves in their shoes rather than a presenter reading from slides.
A facilitator who understands what it means to sit at that table — the competing pressures, the visibility, the isolation of the decision — earns a kind of latitude that a trainer (no matter how brilliant) may not be given. That credibility allows for harder, more candid conversations to occur.
4. They give leaders a shared language for how they think, decide and communicate
A lack of self-awareness is a widely known challenge for individuals at all levels, and it can cause friction in the C-suite. It’s important that leaders have a framework to better understand themselves and others.
However, we have to go a step further in these development sessions. Executives also struggle because they often don’t have a shared way to talk about why they see a problem differently, or why a decision that seems obvious to one person looks reckless to another.
The most useful frameworks in this space give the entire leadership team a shared operating language so that disagreements about priorities or approaches become conversations about different perspectives, rather than personality conflicts.
5. They’re experiential, not lecture-driven
I believe this recommendation holds true at every level of the organization, and it deserves its own callout: executives don’t want to be talked at. A room full of senior leaders is also a room full of expertise, hard-won judgment and pattern recognition. A program that treats them as an audience instead of a source of insight wastes a valuable resource.
The sessions that change how a leadership team operates use real scenarios, decisions and structured experiences to empower participants to apply concepts immediately.
It’s also vital to make space for attendees to share what they know with each other. When a CFO and a CMO collaborate and see how they each think through a decision, they build a shared way of working from that exchange and turn the learning into a conversation. And that holds a lot more meaning and lasting impact that a slide deck can deliver.
How to Design Executive Leadership Development That Executives Actually Want
At Emergenetics International, we’ve built our approach to executive leadership development around these five principles. We take the time to get to know what the group is already wrestling with, whether that’s getting aligned quickly to keep pace with a fast-moving strategy, making better decisions together to stay ahead of the competition, rebuilding the trust that a merger or restructuring has strained or creating conversations that turn a group of individuals into a high-performing team.
Our work centers on a few themes we’ve seen show up again and again:
- Alignment — because strategy can only move as fast as the leadership team executing it.
- Leading through change — giving individuals a shared language for communication and decision-making as they navigate growth, complexity and transformation.
- Better decisions through better understanding — helping leaders see how different thinking and behavioral preferences shape the discussions and decisions that drive the business.
- Stronger communication and connections — creating the conditions for the trust and candor that leadership teams need and rarely have time to build.
- Insight to action — making sure the work doesn’t end at self-awareness, so commitments turn into accountability.
If you’re curious what this could look like in your organization, let’s connect!
Reach out to our team to start the conversation today.
Print This Post
